CULTURETECHLENSsuper bad
STRONG EVIDENCE evidence grade — master store (canonical CSV)
Combined Graph record U-00610 · provenance: canonical master store (CSV), record CTL-W-0208. Master record source: CTL seed 2026-10-16 — UNVERIFIED, verify before public citation.
Language Log (Univ. of Pennsylvania linguistics, fetched in full) quoting OED: bad, slang sense 12 'As a general term of approbation: good, excellent, impressive; esp. stylish or attractive' (citations from 1897; 1955 Feather Encycl. Jazz 'Bad, adj. Good'); sense 13 'Originally in African-American usage... formidably skilled.' 'Super bad' is the intensified form (James Brown 1970 refrain per seed context); stored gloss 'excellent' supported for headword bad.
Answer summary · this record in brief, from its own record text
Language Log (Univ. of Pennsylvania linguistics, fetched in full) quoting OED: bad, slang sense 12 'As a general term of approbation: good, excellent, impressive; esp. stylish or attractive' (citations from 1897; 1955 Feather Encycl. Jazz 'Bad, adj. Good'); sense 13 'Originally in African-American usage... formidably skilled.' 'Super bad' is the intensified form (James Brown 1970 refrain per seed context); stored gloss 'excellent' supported for headword bad.
The record
- Work type: phrase
Sources
- https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=58488 (verification source · master store)
Evidence note (master store)
Language Log (Univ. of Pennsylvania linguistics, fetched in full) quoting OED: bad, slang sense 12 'As a general term of approbation: good, excellent, impressive; esp. stylish or attractive' (citations from 1897; 1955 Feather Encycl. Jazz 'Bad, adj. Good'); sense 13 'Originally in African-American usage... formidably skilled.' 'Super bad' is the intensified form (James Brown 1970 refrain per seed context); stored gloss 'excellent' supported for headword bad.
More work records
Browse the full directory: all entity records
Record CTL-W-0208 · Combined Graph record U-00610 · CultureTechLens Knowledge Graph · 1 source.
Directory: all entity records · the knowledge graph
Researched and maintained by the CultureTechLens research program · CultureTechLens Combined Graph, Release 2026-11-04. Corrections are public: the corrections log.
Cite this record
Chicago: CultureTechLens. “super bad (CTL-W-0208).” CultureTechLens Combined Graph. Chicago, IL: CultureTechLens, 2026. https://culturetechlens.com/graph/entities/ctl-w-0208/
APA: CultureTechLens. (2026). super bad (CTL-W-0208) [Entity record]. CultureTechLens Combined Graph. https://culturetechlens.com/graph/entities/ctl-w-0208/
MLA: CultureTechLens. “super bad (CTL-W-0208).” CultureTechLens Combined Graph, 2026, https://culturetechlens.com/graph/entities/ctl-w-0208/
Citation guidance for teachers, journalists, and funders: How to Cite Us.
From the Archive
The archive in pictures
The people, places, and institutions this work documents. Photographs from the CultureTechLens research record — rights-cleared, credited, and cited like everything else here.
Trust & evidence
Evidence before authority. CultureTechLens publishes its methods, its limits, and its corrections alongside its findings. Claims carry grades — VERIFIED, SUPPORTED, PROVISIONAL, DISPUTED, UNRESOLVED — and unknowns are never reported as zero.
Every claim graded. Every source named. Every correction public — see the corrections log.