
Photo: Steven Kevil, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
CULTURETECHLENS · “Culture, Clearly Seen.” · Black Cultural Intelligence
CTL Index Methodology
CTL Reference Sheet · Version 1.0 · Published 2026-09-30
The CTL Index Methodology (CTL-IDX-001 v1.1) powers the monthly CTL 10 ranking. Scoring is three-signal: 40% Wikipedia pageviews, 40% CTL research-corpus evidence depth, 20% momentum — computed by ctl-index.py with no hand-tuned scores. The methodology is live at culturetechlens.com/research/culturetechlens-index/methodology/.
Verifiable facts
| Research ID | CTL-IDX-001 v1.1 |
|---|---|
| Type | Research Infrastructure — Index methodology |
| Central question | How does the CultureTechLens Index rank cultural resonance? |
| Status | Published v1.1; live at culturetechlens.com/research/culturetechlens-index/methodology/ |
| Key numbers | Three-signal scoring: 40% Wikipedia pageviews · 40% CTL evidence depth · 20% momentum; computed by ctl-index.py — no hand-tuned scores |
| Publisher | CultureTechLens NFP, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization (EIN 39-3143901), Chicago, Illinois |
How to cite this sheet
APA: CultureTechLens. (2026). CTL Index Methodology (CTL Reference Sheet, Version 1.0) [Web page]. CultureTechLens. https://culturetechlens.com/reference/index-methodology/ MLA: CultureTechLens. “CTL Index Methodology.” CTL Reference Sheet, Version 1.0, CultureTechLens, 30 Sept. 2026, https://culturetechlens.com/reference/index-methodology/. Accessed DD Mon. YYYY. Chicago: CultureTechLens. “CTL Index Methodology.” CTL Reference Sheet, Version 1.0. CultureTechLens, September 30, 2026. https://culturetechlens.com/reference/index-methodology/.
Cite as: CultureTechLens, “CTL Index Methodology”, 2026-09-30.
Source: CultureTechLens.
Trust & evidence
Evidence before authority. CultureTechLens publishes its methods, its limits, and its corrections alongside its findings. Claims carry grades — VERIFIED, SUPPORTED, PROVISIONAL, DISPUTED, UNRESOLVED — and unknowns are never reported as zero.