Mark Grant
STRONG EVIDENCE evidence grade — master store (canonical CSV)
Combined Graph record U-01786 · provenance: canonical master store (CSV), record CTL-P-0358. Master record source: CTL seed 2026-10-16 — UNVERIFIED, verify before public citation.
Chicago house DJ
Answer summary · this record in brief, from its own record text
Chicago house DJ
The record
- Role(s): DJ, producer
Sources
- https://5mag.net/audio/mark-grant-dj-mix-series/ (verification source · master store)
Evidence note (master store)
Chicago house DJ/producer; the man behind the mix of A Taste of Cajual, described by 5 Magazine as one of the most successful commercially released house music mix CDs; widely credited as the producer who resuscitated vocal house in the 1990s; later deep-house releases include 'Satisfaction' featuring Dajae (per 5 Magazine).
More person records
Browse the full directory: all entity records
Record CTL-P-0358 · Combined Graph record U-01786 · CultureTechLens Knowledge Graph · 1 source.
Directory: all entity records · the knowledge graph
Researched and maintained by the CultureTechLens research program · CultureTechLens Combined Graph, Release 2026-11-04. Corrections are public: the corrections log.
Cite this record
Chicago: CultureTechLens. “Mark Grant (CTL-P-0358).” CultureTechLens Combined Graph. Chicago, IL: CultureTechLens, 2026. https://culturetechlens.com/graph/entities/ctl-p-0358/
APA: CultureTechLens. (2026). Mark Grant (CTL-P-0358) [Entity record]. CultureTechLens Combined Graph. https://culturetechlens.com/graph/entities/ctl-p-0358/
MLA: CultureTechLens. “Mark Grant (CTL-P-0358).” CultureTechLens Combined Graph, 2026, https://culturetechlens.com/graph/entities/ctl-p-0358/
Citation guidance for teachers, journalists, and funders: How to Cite Us.
From the Archive
The archive in pictures
The people, places, and institutions this work documents. Photographs from the CultureTechLens research record — rights-cleared, credited, and cited like everything else here.



Trust & evidence
Evidence before authority. CultureTechLens publishes its methods, its limits, and its corrections alongside its findings. Claims carry grades — VERIFIED, SUPPORTED, PROVISIONAL, DISPUTED, UNRESOLVED — and unknowns are never reported as zero.
Every claim graded. Every source named. Every correction public — see the corrections log.